This report presents a snapshot of key health, environmental and financial costs assuming a “business as usual” trajectory to 2040 in four fast-growing African cities: Accra, Cairo, Johannesburg and Lagos. It then contrasts this prediction with an indicative scenario in which the cities adopt a set of clean air measures.
This study looked to find a representative sample of cities that could show concrete benefits of clean air measures in their own right as well as the wider opportunities for other African cities. The cumulative impacts of these benefits should be viewed in this light.
Use the arrows to navigate through these 9 key findings:
Which clean air measures are we talking about?
Five indicative clean air policies were chosen to give a sense of what is possible. These policies were selected because they address key sources of air pollution in the four cities – road traffic, industrial activities, household energy, land clearing and waste burning – while at the same time reducing GHG emissions. Importantly, they are also known to be feasible in the selected cities, although their effectiveness naturally varies. They are deliberately high-level, to account for differing contexts and needs. There is much more detail on the situation in each of our chosen megacities below here. The clean air policies are:
- Strengthening public transport infrastructure to deliver a 25% reduction in gasoline and diesel fuel road traffic;
- Deploying clean cookstoves and alternative fuel sources, to directly reduce household air pollution, and indirectly, reduce ambient air pollution;
- Switching to cleaner sources of energy for industry to reduce harmful emissions;
- Implementing support systems to switch from slash-and burn to sustainable land-clearing practices;
- Implementing waste management systems that improve collection, prevent open burning and improve incineration practices.
Or explore the rest of the report: